Your Child May Be Sharing Their Hardest Feelings With AI, Not You. Here Is the One Skill That Changes That.
A RAND Corporation study published in JAMA Pediatrics found that nearly 1 in 5 teenagers and young adults now use AI chatbots for mental health support when they feel sad, angry, nervous, or stressed. That rate jumped 40% in a single year and now nearly matches the share receiving professional counseling. Among those using AI for emotional support, 63% never told anyone. The gap is not about how much kids use AI. It is about what happens when the skill of emotional disclosure gets replaced by a conversation that costs nothing.
A RAND Corporation study published in JAMA Pediatrics in June 2026 surveyed more than 1,200 young people ages 12 to 21. It found that 19.2% now use AI chatbots for mental health support, up from 13.1% one year earlier. That is a 40% jump, and it now nearly matches the 19.8% receiving professional mental health counseling. Among those using AI for emotional support, 63% never disclosed this to anyone, including parents, friends, or counselors. Four in ten teenagers who experienced a major depressive episode in the past year received no mental health services at all.
What this issue covers: What the RAND study found and why the secret nature of it matters most for families. Why adolescent emotional development requires real human interaction, not simulated support. Emotional Disclosure as the specific skill at risk and how it gets built. Two observable signs your child is already practicing it. Three things you can do this week. Plus The Feelings Translator, a 50-minute creative activity that makes emotional disclosure feel natural and low-stakes.
Last month, a study landed in JAMA Pediatrics that I had to read twice. Nearly one in five American teenagers and young adults now use AI chatbots for mental health support, seeking help when they feel sad, angry, nervous, or stressed.[1] That number jumped 40% in a single year. But the statistic that stopped me cold was not the usage rate. It was this: 63% of the kids doing it never told anyone. Not a parent. Not a friend. Not a counselor. They were taking their hardest feelings to a machine, in private, and the people in their lives had no idea.
A new RAND Corporation study finds that 1 in 5 teens now use AI chatbots for mental health support, nearly matching professional therapy rates, and most kids are doing it without telling anyone.
The numbers come from a RAND Corporation survey of more than 1,200 young people ages 12 to 21, published in June 2026 in JAMA Pediatrics.[1] The researchers found that 19.2% had used AI chatbots including ChatGPT, Gemini, Character.AI, and Meta AI for emotional support. A year earlier, the same research team found the rate at 13.1%.[2] That is not a slow drift. That is a fast shift.
What makes this harder to absorb is the comparison that follows. About 19.8% of the same survey group had seen a licensed mental health professional.[1] AI chatbot use has, in the span of a year, quietly reached parity with professional therapy as a mental health resource for young people. The kids using it are not all in crisis. Many are using it the same way they might call a friend: for processing, for venting, for feeling a little less alone.
And 4 in 10 teenagers who experienced a major depressive episode in the past year received no professional mental health services at all.[2] For some of those kids, an AI chatbot may be the only thing they reached for. That is not a technology problem. That is a gap in care that technology is moving fast to fill.
When adolescents process their hardest feelings through AI rather than with real people, they miss the developmental experiences that build emotional resilience.
Here is what I keep coming back to as a parent. My oldest is 13. The years she is in right now are some of the most important for emotional development, not because I am pushing her toward it, but because the adolescent brain is literally wiring itself during this period for how it will handle difficulty, connection, and stress for the rest of a life. Those wiring experiences happen through real interactions, not simulated ones.
63% of teenagers using AI for mental health support never told anyone they were doing it. Not a parent. Not a friend. Not a counselor.
When a teenager tells an AI that she is anxious before a test, the AI responds with something calm and validating. That feels good. But the AI is not affected by her anxiety. It does not worry about her. It does not have to figure out what to say while managing its own reaction. It never says the wrong thing and has to repair the relationship afterward. That is not a minor limitation. That is the whole point of the experience being missing.
A parent, a friend, or a counselor who receives that same disclosure is changed by it. They feel something. They have to figure out how to respond. Sometimes they get it wrong, and then they come back and try again. That friction, the awkward silence, the imperfect response, the do-over conversation, is what teaches a kid that relationships can hold difficult feelings. AI never teaches that lesson, because it never struggles.[3]
The skill is Emotional Disclosure: the ability to name what you are feeling and bring it to another person who is actually capable of being moved by it.
I want to be careful not to make this sound simpler than it is. Emotional Disclosure is not the same as talking about your feelings. Plenty of kids can narrate their day without disclosing anything real. What I am talking about is the specific act of identifying something uncomfortable inside yourself and deciding to share it with another person, knowing they might react in ways you cannot control.
That is hard. For a lot of kids, and honestly for a lot of adults, it is easier to tell an AI because the stakes feel lower. The AI will never be disappointed, will not bring it up later, and will not tell someone else.[3] And 92% of kids who used AI for emotional support said the advice felt helpful.[1] It probably did feel that way in the moment. That is not the problem.
The problem is that Emotional Disclosure is a skill, and skills require practice with real resistance. A musician cannot develop timing by practicing with a metronome that adjusts itself to follow them. A child cannot develop emotional courage by practicing only with a system designed never to push back. What feels like support may actually be practice avoidance. The more comfortable AI feels, the easier it becomes to avoid the discomfort that real disclosure requires.
Children practicing Emotional Disclosure use specific words for their feelings and bring those feelings to real people, even when it is uncomfortable.
You are looking for moments, not transformations. Does your kid come to you when something is wrong, even in a roundabout way? My youngest tends to hover near me in the kitchen for ten minutes before saying anything. That hovering is disclosure. She is testing the conditions before she commits to the conversation. I have learned to slow down and let it develop rather than filling the silence.
Does your kid use specific language for their emotional states? There is a real difference between “I’m fine” and “I don’t know, I just feel like nobody noticed.” The second one required your child to do some internal work and decide to let you in. Pay attention to repair, too. A kid who gets upset, pulls back, and then comes back later to continue the conversation is learning that relationships can hold difficult feelings and survive intact. That is the foundational lesson Emotional Disclosure rests on.
Start with curiosity rather than concern. Your goal this week is to lower the cost of real disclosure, not to compete with an AI chatbot.
Ask about the tool before you ask about the feeling. If your kid uses AI chatbots, start the conversation there. Ask what they have used it for, whether they find it helpful, whether it has ever given advice that felt off.[4] This is not surveillance. It is joining them where they already are. Once you are in that conversation, you can start walking alongside rather than feeling like you are chasing from behind.
Model disclosure first. Tell your kid something real about your own inner life this week. Not a lesson or a lecture. Just: “I had a moment today where I didn’t know what to do with what I was feeling.” Then stop. Let them sit with the idea that you have real feelings and that you chose to share one. That is an invitation, not a demand.
Create low-stakes practice environments. Car rides are underrated for this. Side by side, no eye contact, going somewhere with a clear ending point. Ask something that does not require a right answer: “What is something that has been sitting with you lately?” If they do not answer, that is okay. The door was opened. That matters.
The goal is not to replace AI. My kids will use these tools, and so will yours. The goal is to make sure the hardest, most human experiences in their lives are still finding their way to real people. That only happens when emotional disclosure is practiced regularly with real stakes, real responses, and real repair.
I have three daughters, and the one I think about most with this is actually my oldest. She is self-sufficient to a fault, prefers efficiency to vulnerability, and has access to every AI tool available. If she had a hard feeling and an AI was more available than I was, I think she would tell the AI. Not because she does not trust me. But because disclosure with a real person costs something, and she does not always want to pay it.
That cost is the whole point. The children who learn to pay it, who learn to say something real to a person who might not respond perfectly and who stay in the conversation even when it gets uncomfortable, are building something no AI can replicate. The skill is called Emotional Disclosure. Like all real skills, it only develops through practice. Which means it only develops with us.
The Feelings Translator
Why This Activity Works
The RAND study found that 63% of teens using AI for emotional support never disclosed it to anyone. The reason is not that these kids do not want connection. It is that real disclosure has a cost: you cannot control how the other person responds. The Feelings Translator lowers that cost by separating the translation step from the sharing step. Turning a feeling into a metaphor gives a child just enough distance to approach it. The final step, naming a real person and what would make telling them easier, is where the activity bridges from creative expression to actual practice. The goal is not one big conversation. It is a family habit of making feelings speakable between real people.
Ask This at Dinner
Listen for the specific obstacle they name. It is too embarrassing. I do not know how to start. I do not want to make it a big deal. I am not sure what I want back. Each of those is a different skill to practice. A child who can name what makes disclosure hard has already done some of the most important internal work. That is not a problem to solve in the conversation. It is something to hold onto and return to slowly.
Three free reads to go further
This kind of thinking,
delivered weekly.
Raised Nimble translates AI and learning research into practical guidance for parents. Free, every Friday. No fluff.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.